This article is so rich, I don't even know where to start!
Democrat John Kerry on Friday dismissed the Republican convention as "bitter and insulting" and promised to be a president who would tell Americans the truth.
I can only imagine how comparing Bush to Hitler is somehow acceptable, but highlighting Kerry's abysmal 20 year Senate record is bitter and insulting.
It's a long journey ahead for Kerry. He claims he'll be a president that will tell the truth. Hopefully, we'll never find out, but it is humorous as it sounds he'll start to tell the truth only after he's elected. It sounds a lot like his Secret War Plan (he allegedly has diplomatic "chips to play," but only if he becomes president will he reveal the leverage he alleges).
Surely, rational individuals would agree: If you testify to personal, first-hand knowledge of something and talk about it for 20 years only to change your tune when you run for president (when, suddenly, people care what you think), it's not nuance. No matter what the definition of is is, it's called lying.
He listed some of Bush's reasons for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq -- weapons of mass destruction and connections to al Qaeda -- and added after each: "That wasn't true."
Kerry mis-characterizes the evidence again. Never mind the fact that Kerry himself has been quoted numerous times saying that Sadaam had WDM. He did vote for the war (but not funding it). According to the 9/11 Commission, there was substantial evidence proving al Qaeda and Sadaam Hussein connections (they did however say Iraq's involvement in 9/11 was unlikely).
The article further states:
[Kerry] would not allow President Bush or others to question his fitness for the White House.
Is this whiny elitist snob the same photo-op-jock-strap-buyin', wind-surfing, bike-ridin', medal-totin' (or was it ribbon-throwing, I forget), tough-guy that told Bush to BRING IT ON?
Comments